It deals with the mental and physical tribulation brought upon him by his crime. His troubles are compounded by the conflicting personalities which he possesses. The reader is inclined to characterize him by his cold, intellectual side. Yet, without the contrasting humane side of his nature, Raskolnikov never realizes the errors in his theory and actions.
The essays are ideal for those taking examinations in English Literature. All men are divided into 'ordinary' and 'extraordinary'.
The extraordinary man should have the right to eliminate a few people in order to make his idea known to all humanity; however, the ordinary man has no right to transgress the law.
Because he believes this theory is an idea that must be known to all humanity, he considers himself extraordinary; however, there is a legion of events that prove that Raskolnikov is not extraordinary.
One can be sure that Raskolnikov believes himself to be extraordinary when Porfiry says, '. That's so, isn't it? Raskolnikov was strongly prompted to murder Alyona when he recalled a conversation that took place between two ordinary men in a bar. I could kill that damned old woman and make off with her money without the faintest conscious-prick For one life, thousands would be saved from corruption and decay Besides, what value has the life of that sickly, stupid, ill-natured old woman in the balance of existence?
During Raskolnikov's visit to the police station to retrieve his pledges, he and Porfiry become engaged in conversation involving the theory. Porfiry voiced concerns about ordinary people mistaking themselves as extra-ordinary.
Raskolnikov responded with, '. But the preparations to be made were few'; Porfiry also voiced his concern that 'ordinary'; people might mistake themselves as 'extraordinary'; and kill innocent people when they have no inner right to do so.
Raskolnikov concurs with him when he says, 'The vain and foolish are particularly apt to fall into that snare; young people especially'; The first sentence of the novel points out Raskolnikov's age: Unknowingly Raskolnikov put himself into his own category of ignorant, vulnerable people.
Though according to Raskolnikov, an 'extraordinary man'; has the right to transgress the law, he never implies that the extraordinary man's conscience won't torment him. In fact he states, 'Pain and suffering are always inevitable for a large intelligence and a deep heart. This point of his theory does not apply to him.
Raskolnikov's theory says, 'The extraordinary man has the right to commit any crime and. His 'new word'; the part of his theory that asserted that the killing of innocent people was sometimes acceptable did not actually require the elimination of any person to make it known.
It was after all, made known to people when it was published in a magazine, therefore, he didn't have the right to kill Alyona in the first place. Some might say that, in accordance with his theory, Raskolnikov suffered illness after his crime, thereby making him extraordinary. Though it's true that he suffered, he never said perpetration of a crime by an extraordinary man is always accompanied by illness.
Also, Raskolnikov was ill before he had committed the murders. This strongly suggests that his malady was not actually related to the crime at all.
After the original introduction of his Extraordinary Man theoryRaskolnikov contends that the 'Extraordinary Man'; must be self-reliant, depend on no one, and be cut off from society. Though there are times when he wants to escape humanity, time and again it is obvious that Raskolnikov needs companionship.
In several instances, Raskolnikov visited Sonia. Raskolnikov's longing for communion proves that he doesn't fulfill his own requirements of extraordinariness. Raskolnikov likes to think that he is an 'extraordinary man';, but the reader sees quite another side of him.
Through his contradictory ideas, life that was inconsistent with the 'Extraordinary Man'; theory, and social behavior, it becomes obvious that Raskolnikov is actually rather ordinary.
Research paper and essay writing, free essay topics, sample works Crime And Punishment--is Rasko Please do not pass this sample essay as your own, otherwise you will be accused of plagiarism.
Our writers can write any custom essay for you!An Essay on Crime and Punishment by Cesare Becarria kaja-net.com Page 3 AN ESSAY ON CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS.
CHAPTER I. OF THE ORIGIN OF PUNISHMENTS. Laws are the conditions under which men, naturally independent, united themselves in society.
Value Change Essay- 3rd Draft In Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky, the main character, Raskolnikov, develops throughout the novel and ultimately becomes a dynamic character. Raskolnikov first seems as an individual who struggles with conforming to society and believes in his superiority.
This “Crime and Punishment” essay is dedicated to the theme of alienation from the society which is one of the central ideas of the novel. In the first place, this idea is revealed through the main character Rodion Raskolnikov. Crime And Punishment is Rasko – Сustom Literature essay Sample essay topic, essay writing: Crime And Punishment--is Rasko - words In Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov concocts a theory: All men are divided into 'ordinary' and 'extraordinary'.
An Essay on Crime and Punishment by Cesare Becarria kaja-net.com Page 3 AN ESSAY ON CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS.
CHAPTER I. OF THE ORIGIN OF PUNISHMENTS. Laws are the conditions under which men, naturally independent, united themselves in society. - Crime and Punishment and Raskolnikov's article, "On Crime" Raskolnikov's article, "On Crime," is vital to the understanding of his beliefs.
This article also has a profound effect on Crime and Punishment as a whole, the subject matter being one of .